ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00063525
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Geanina Musat | Atd Cleaning Limited Atd Cleaning Limited Good Cleaners Ireland |
Representatives | No Appearance | No Appearance |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act 1991 | CA-00077474-001 | 12/11/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 25/08/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Christina Ryan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard and to present any evidence relevant to the complaint.
This matter was heard by way of a remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and S.I. 359/2020, which designated the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing and did not give evidence in support of her complaint. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance at the hearing by or on behalf of the Respondent. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint pursuant to the Payment of Wages Act 1991 was received by the WRC on 12 November 2025. The said complaint was referred to me for adjudication. A hearing for that purpose was scheduled for the 25 August 2025. There was no attendance by either party at the hearing. I am satisfied that the parties were informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing of the complaint would be held. In the circumstances and in the absence of direct evidence, I must conclude that the complaint is not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
For the reasons set out above, I find that the complaint is not well founded and I decide accordingly. |
Dated: 08-09-26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Christina Ryan
Key Words:
|
