ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00063278
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Maris Benkis | Lteco Telecoms Limited |
Representatives | Did not attend | Did not attend |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00076758-001 | 23/10/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00076758-002 | 23/10/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00077115-002 | 04/11/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 23 of the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 2015 | CA-00077115-004 | 04/11/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00077115-005 | 04/11/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 26/08/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s).
Background:
A complaint was received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 24th October 2025. The complainant commenced employment on 1st September 2021. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the scheduled hearing of the complaint. I am satisfied that both parties to the complaint were notified of the arrangements for the hearing of the complaint. Letters containing all arrangements for the hearing were sent to both parties on 19th July 2026. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the scheduled hearing of the complaint. I am satisfied that both parties to the complaint were notified of the arrangements for the hearing of the complaint. Letters containing all arrangements for the hearing were sent to both parties on 19th July 2026. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission on 24th October 2025 in which the complainant was alleging that his employer was contravening the provisions of statute in relation to him. The said complaint was referred to me for investigation. A hearing for that purpose was scheduled for 26th August 2026. There was no appearance by or on behalf of both parties at the hearing. I am satisfied that both parties were informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held.
In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence being adduced before me , I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint/s in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded. |
Dated: 02-09-26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words:
|