ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00062731
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Ivan Sponar | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics |
Representatives | Did not attend. | IBEC |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00076432-001 | 16/10/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 03/06/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Máire Mulcahy
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 - 2015, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
The complainant did not attend.
The respondent attended and was represented by IBEC. Representatives from the respondent’s HR, Payroll and Production Management departments also attended.
Background:
The complainant submitted a complaint on 16/10/2025 that the respondent had contravened the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act,1991, in relation to him. The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent attended the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations commission from the complainant on the 16/10/2025 alleging that the respondent had contravened the provisions of the of the Payment of Wages Act,1991, in relation to him. A hearing for that purpose was held on 3/6/2026. There was no appearance by the complainant at the hearing nor was any explanation for his absence offered to the WRC. I am satisfied that the said complainant was informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I decide that this complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 16-06-26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Máire Mulcahy
Key Words:
No show. |