ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00063965
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Jack Mackessy | Jmc Paving |
Representatives | No appearance | No appearance |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00076191-001 | 09/10/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 11/06/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gaye Cunningham
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint. This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2020 and S.I. 359 of 2020, which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
Background:
The Complainant submitted a complaint that he was owed wages and payment for annual leave.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing.
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the hearing.
Findings and Conclusions:
Having been duly notified of the date, time and platform convened to hear his complaint, the Complainant did not attend the hearing or provide any explanation for his absence. In the circumstances I find the complaint to be not well founded.
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Based on the reason and finding above, I have decided that the complaint is not well founded.
Dated: 2 July 2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gaye Cunningham
Key Words:
No appearance by either party. Complaint not well founded. |
