ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00060911
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Sanoj Mohanan Sobhana | Dcruz Traders Limited Asian Delight Santry |
Representatives | No Show | No Show |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 24 of the National Minimum Wage Act, 2000 | CA-00073710-001 | 23/07/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 19/02/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Brian Dalton
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant alleged that :
Dear Employment Relations Officer, I am writing to formally seek your advice and assistance regarding an employment issue I am currently facing with my former employer, Dicruz Limited. I commenced employment with Dicruz Limited in November [Year], under an agreement to be paid €653 per week for 39 hours of work. Although I received payslips during my employment, I have not received any actual payment for the work performed. When I raised the issue with the employer, I was informed that full payment would be made together before I took my scheduled holidays in March. I continued working until the 28th of March; however, I was not paid as promised. I have followed up with the company several times, but the director has continuously delayed payment, stating it would be processed the following month The Complainant consented to email communication. He was notified of the hearing at the email address provided and failed to attend. The Respondent was served twice and notified of the hearing and the letter of notification was returned. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant failed to attend at the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent was served at the address detailed and the trading address; however, the letters were returned. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I must dismiss the case as the Complainant has failed to attend. The Complainant was properly notified of the hearing at the address provided. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Arising from the failure to attend at the hearing, I find that the complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 22-07-26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Brian Dalton
Key Words:
No show |