ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00060146
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Ejazullah Safi | Amer Khan |
Representatives | Atif Farooq |
|
Complaints:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00073197-002 | 24/06/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00073197-003 | 24/06/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00073197-004 | 24/06/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Regulation 18 of the European Communities (Road Transport)(Organisation of Working Time of Persons Performing Mobile Road Transport Activities) Regulations 2012 - S.I. No. 36/2012 | CA-00073197-005 | 24/06/2025 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00073197-006 | 24/06/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 17/06/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014 following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
The Complainant initiated a number of complaints against the Respondent received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 24 June 2025.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant nor was there any application for a postponement on the file. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent nor was there any application for a postponement on the file. |
Findings and Conclusions:
After waiting a reasonable period of time for the parties to attend, there was no appearance by or on behalf of either party to the complaints. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
In the absence of the Complainant to provided evidence of his complaint, I find the complaints are not well founded. |
Dated: 13-07-26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Key Words:
|