ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00059635
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Complainant | A Large Retail Store |
Representatives | Cathy Mc Grady BL instructed by Farrell McElwee Solicitors LLP | Dajana Sinik IBEC |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 77 of the Employment Equality Act, 1998 | CA-00072600-001 | 19/06/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 26/06/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Seamus Clinton
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 79 of the Employment Equality Acts, 1998 – 2015, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard and to present any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
This is a parallel complaint to ADJ-00064610- CA-00078727-001 as the same complaints have been decided in that decision. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
|
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
|
Findings and Conclusions:
As this is a parallel complaint to decision ADJ-00064610- CA-00078727-001, I decide that this complaint is not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 79 of the Employment Equality Acts, 1998 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under section 82 of the Act.
As this is a parallel complaint to decision ADJ-00064610- CA-00078727-001, I decide that this complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 10/07/26
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Seamus Clinton
Key Words:
|