ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00057111

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Oliwia Krzywdzinska	Axess Zui Ltd

Representatives

Noel Buckley

Fardeen Abdollah

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00069385-002	18/02/2025
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00069385-003	18/02/2025
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00069385-004	18/02/2025

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 23/10/2025 & 08/01/2026

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Conor Stokes

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.

Background:

This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2020 and S.I. No. 359/2020 which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.

This complaint was a duplicate of ADJ 57112 and should be read in conjunction with that decision.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

As per ADJ 57112

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

As per ADJ 57112

Findings and Conclusions:

As per ADJ 57112

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

This complaint was a duplicate of ADJ 57112 and should be read in conjunction with that decision.

Dated: 13-01-26

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Conor Stokes

Key Words:

Duplicate complaint