ADJUDICATION OFFICER Recommendation on dispute under Industrial Relations Act 1969
Investigation Recommendation Reference: IR - SC - 00004618
Parties:
| Worker | Employer |
Anonymised Parties | A Worker | An Employer |
Dispute(s):
Act | Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969 | IR - SC - 00004618 | 30/06/2025 |
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Conor Stokes
Date of Hearing: 05/02/2026
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 (as amended)following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any information relevant to the dispute.
Background:
This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2020 and S.I. No. 359/2020 which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings. The worker did not attend the hearing, two attendees for the respondent were present. |
Summary of Workers Case:
The worker did not attend the hearing of this complaint. |
Summary of Employer’s Case:
Two attendees from the employer were present for the hearing. |
Conclusions:
In conducting my investigation, I have taken into account all relevant submissions presented to me by the parties. The worker did not attend the hearing and provided no reason for his nonattendance. |
Recommendation:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
As the worker did not attend the hearing my recommendation is that the party to a dispute should attend hearings that they instigate.
Dated: 12-02-2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Conor Stokes
Key Words:
Industrial Relations Act – worker nonattendance – recommendation to attend dispute instigated |