ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00057030
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Eoin Walsh | Airport Hopper Airport Hopper Holdings Ltd |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00069356-001 | 18/02/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 26/02/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
The matter was heard by way of remote hearing on 26 February 2026, pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and S.I. 359/2020, which designated the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
Background:
A complaint form was received by the WRC on 18 February 2025
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission from the complainant on 18 February 2025, alleging that his former former employer, the respondent, contravened the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991, in relation to him. The said complaint was referred to me for investigation. A hearing for that purpose was held on 26 February 2026. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant at the hearing. I am satisfied that the said complainant was informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly.
|
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 16th of April 2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Key Words:
No show |