ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00056340
Parties:
| 
 | Complainant | Respondent | 
| Parties | Blanaid Cooney | Parish Busawah | 
| Representatives | 
 | Ciaran Doherty B.L. instructed by Wilkie & Flanagan LLP | 
Complaints:
| Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00066524-001 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00066524-002 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 45A of the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 | CA-00066524-003 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 23 of the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 2015 | CA-00066524-004 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00066524-005 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00066524-006 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 77 of the Employment Equality Act, 1998 | CA-00066524-008 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 16 of the Protection of Employees (Part-Time Work) Act, 2001 | CA-00066524-009 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 14 of the Protection of Employees (Fixed-Term Work) Act, 2003 | CA-00066524-010 | 07/10/2024 | 
| Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00066524-021 | 07/10/2024 | 
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 10/09/2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and/or Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 - 2015, and/or Section 79 of the Employment Equality Acts, 1998 - 2015,following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
| The complainant did not attend the hearing which was held online. | 
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
| The respondent was online for the hearing. | 
Findings and Conclusions:
| A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission by the complainant alleging breaches of the above statutes and was referred to me for investigation. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant at the hearing. No explanation was received for her failure to do so. I am satisfied that the complainant consented to receiving correspondence by email and was sent notice in writing to the address provided on the complaint form of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaints are not well-founded and I decide accordingly. | 
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the unfair dismissal claim consisting of a grant of redress in accordance with section 7 of the 1977 Act.
Section 79 of the Employment Equality Acts, 1998 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under section 82 of the Act.
| For the reason set out above none of the complaints CA-66524—001 to 006 inclusive, or 008 to 010, inclusive or 021 are not well founded. | 
Dated: 09-10-25
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Key Words:
| 
 | 

