ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00053712
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Andrei Cadar | Anton Gud Price Work For Codge (Drywall) |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00065680-001 | 29/08/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 10/11/2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Patricia Owens
Procedure:
On 29 August 2025 the Complainant referred a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission pursuant to section 6 of the payment of Wages Act, 1991. In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace relations Act, 2015 and following the referral of the complains to me by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission, a hearing was convened on 10 November 2025 to afford the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence they deemed relevant to the complaints.
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant; neither was there any appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent and neither party provided written submissions.
Background:
In his complaint form, the Complainant alleged that he was owed €12000 for work carried out between 22 July 2024 and 6 August 2024. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant and the Complainant did not provide any further information to support his complaint.
The Respondent operates in the construction industry. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent, neither did the Respondent provide a written submission outlining it’s position.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant and the Complainant did not provide any further information to support his complaint. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent, neither did the Respondent provide a written submission outlining it’s position. |
Findings and Conclusions:
On the day of the hearing, I awaited the attendance of the parties for in excess of 20 minutes beyond the scheduled start time but there was no appearance by or on behalf of either party at the hearing. I allowed 10 days from the day of hearing for either party to make contact with the WRC post hearing to explain the absence, before finalising this decision. No contact was made. As the Complainant was not present to move his complaint and in the context that I am satisfied that the said Complainant was informed in writing of the arrangements for the hearing, in the absence of any explanation for his non-attendance, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
For the reasons outlined above I have found that this complaint is not well founded, and I decide accordingly. |
Dated: 24-11-2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Patricia Owens
Key Words:
|