ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00054919

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Jurij Katran	Ht Roofing & Cladding Solutions Ltd

	Complainant	Respondent
Anonymised Parties	{text}	{text}

Representatives

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00066969-001	25/10/2024

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 07/04/2025

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.

Although I am satisfied that both the Complainant and the Respondent were on notice of the time and date of the hearing, neither party attended on the day to give evidence in relation to the complaint.

Background:

In his complaint form submitted to the WRC, the Complainant stated that he was not paid in respect of 50.75 hours that he worked for the Respondent.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The Complainant did not attend on the day of the hearing to give evidence in relation to his complaint.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The Respondent did not attend on the day of the hearing to give evidence in relation to the complaint.

Findings and Conclusions:

As the Complainant did not attend the hearing to give evidence, I find that this complaint is not well founded.

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

I find that this complaint is not well founded for the reason set out above.

Dated: 23-05-2025

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill

Key Words: