ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00047863
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Alexander Apati | Designer Eyewear Ltd. |
Representatives | No Appearance | No Appearance |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00058831-002 | 14/09/2023 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 21/05/2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complain and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
At the adjudication hearing on the 21st of May 2025 there was no appearance by or on behalf of either party. Being satisfied that both parties were on notice of the time, date and venue for the adjudication hearing, I proceeded in the absence of the parties. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent. |
Findings and Conclusions:
In the absence of any appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant the Respondent has no case to answer and the claim is not well-founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
CA-00058831-002 – Claim not well-founded |
Dated: 23rd of May 2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Key Words:
No appearance |