ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00056786

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Sebastian Iwaniuk	Marcin Swoboda/Smes Owner

Representatives

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00068771-001	22/01/2025

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 14/05/2025

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.

Background:

In his complaint form submitted to the WRC, the Complainant stated that he did not receive his holiday entitlements.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The Complainant did not attend on the day of the hearing to give evidence in relation to his complaint.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

As the Complainant did not attend on the day of the hearing to give evidence in relation to his complaint, the Respondent did not present any evidence.

Findings and Conclusions:

As the Complainant did not attend on the day of the hearing to give evidence in relation to his complaint, I find that the complaint is not well founded.

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

I find that the complaint is not well founded for the reasons set out above.

Dated: 18th June 2025.

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill

Key Words: