ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00051737
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Hassan Mohamed | Cognizant Na |
| Complainant | Respondent |
Representatives | Non-Appearance | Kirsty Cooper |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00063370-001 | 09/05/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 09/10/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 6 of the section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and SI 359/20206, which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
Opening Legal Argument
As neither Party attended the Hearing, having been properly notified of the date, time and place, the Complaint had to be deemed Not Properly Founded.
No mitigating bona fide excuses were received.
It fails.
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 and Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions of the cited Acts.
CA: 00063370-001
The complaint is Not Properly Founded.
It fails.
Dated: 10th April 2025.
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Key Words:
Payment of Wages Act,1991. No Show |