ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00009925
Complaints:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00012961-001 | 04/08/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00012961-002 | 04/08/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 18/10/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. No explanation was offered for her failure to do so. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The complainant did not attend to present her case and it falls for want of prosecution. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
For the reason set out above complaints CA-00012961-001 and 002 fall for want of prosecution and are dismissed. |
Dated: 19/09/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Key Words:
Non appearance of complainant, case falls for want of prosecution |