ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
CORRECTION ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 39 OF THE ORGANISATION OF WORKING TIME ACT, 1997. THIS CORRECTION ORDER SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DECISION ISSUED ON 9th of July 2018.
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00011418
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Complainant | A Respondent |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00015145-001 | 20/10/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 12/04/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The complainant referred a complaint against the above respondent on the 20thth of November, 2017. As required by the Act and, as part of my investigation, I proceeded to a hearing on the 12th of April, 2018. On the day of the hearing, neither the complainant nor the respondent was in attendance. This decision is issued by me following the establishment of the Workplace Relations Commission on 1 October 2015, as an Adjudication Officer who was an Equality Officer prior to 1 October 2015, in accordance with section 83 (3) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As part of my investigation I am obliged to hold a hearing. I am satisfied that both parties received notification of the hearing arrangements. I find that the complainant's failure to attend such a hearing was unreasonable in the circumstances. As no evidence was given at the hearing in support of the allegations made I find that that the complaint fails and is not upheld. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
As no evidence was given at the hearing in support of the allegations made I find that that the complaint fails and is not upheld. |
Dated: 9th July, 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Key Words: |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00011418
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Complainant | A Respondent |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00015145-001 | 20/10/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 12/04/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The complainant referred a complaint against the above respondent on the 20thth of November, 2017. As required by the Act and, as part of my investigation, I proceeded to a hearing on the 12th of April, 2018. On the day of the hearing, neither the complainant nor the respondent was in attendance. This decision is issued by me following the establishment of the Workplace Relations Commission on 1 October 2015, as an Adjudication Officer who was an Equality Officer prior to 1 October 2015, in accordance with section 83 (3) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As part of my investigation I am obliged to hold a hearing. I am satisfied that both parties received notification of the hearing arrangements. I find that the complainant's failure to attend such a hearing was unreasonable in the circumstances. As no evidence was given at the hearing in support of the allegations made I find that that the complaint fails and is not upheld. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
As no evidence was given at the hearing in support of the allegations made I find that that the complaint fails and is not upheld. |
Dated: 9th July, 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Key Words:
|