ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00008615
Parties:
|
|
Complainant |
Respondent |
|
Parties |
A General Operative |
A construction company |
Complaint(s):
|
Act |
Complaint/Dispute Reference No. |
Date of Receipt |
|
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 |
CA-00006287-002 |
04/08/2016 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 24/08/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
|
Although the Complainant’s representative was in attendance the Complainant did not, even though he was aware well in advance of the date and time for the hearing. The Respondent did not attend the hearing.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
|
|
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
|
|
Findings and Conclusions:
|
This case is dismissed for the want of prosecution.
|
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
|
This case is dismissed for the want of prosecution.
|
Dated: 20/11/17
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Key Words:
|
Want of prosecution |