This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

DWT2513

null

WTC/24/65
DECISION  NO.  DWT2513

SECTION 44, WORKPLACE RELATIONS ACT 2015
ORGANISATION OF WORKING TIME ACT 1997


PARTIES:

RESPOND
(REPRESENTED BY BEAUCHAMPS)

AND

GRACE MYSLINSKI
(REPRESENTED BY PCW CONSULTING LIMITED)



DIVISION:

Chairman: Mr Haugh
Employer Member: Mr Marie
Worker Member: Ms Treacy



SUBJECT:

Appeal of Adjudication Officer Decision No's: ADJ-00050562 (CA-00061713-002)


BACKGROUND:

The Worker appealed the Adjudication Officer's Decision to the Labour Court on the 1 July 2024. A Labour Court Hearing took place on the 7 February 2025. The following is the Labour Court's Decision






DECISION:

Background to the Appeal

This is an appeal by Ms Grace Myslinski (‘the Complainant’) from a decision of an Adjudication Officer (ADJ-00050562/CA-00061713-002, dated 28 May 2024) under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 (‘the Act’). The Adjudication Officer decided that the claim was made “outside of the timeframe provided for in legislation”. Notice of the Appeal was received in the Court on 1 July 2024. The Court heard the appeal in Waterford on 7 February 2025.

Preliminary Issue

At the outset of the within hearing, Mr Paul Gough, Solicitor for Respond (‘the Respondent’) submitted that the Complainant’s claim was time barred having regard to section 41(6) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015. The Complainant submitted that her claim should not be found to be time barred as she had referred it to the Workplace Relations Commission promptly having exhausted the Respondent’s internal procedures.

The Law

Section 41(6) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 provides:

“(6) Subject to subsection (8), an adjudication officer shall not entertain a complaint referred to him or her under this section if it has been presented to the Director General after the expiration of the period of 6 months beginning on the date of the contravention to which the complaint relates.”

Discussion and Decision

It is common case that the within claim relates to untaken annual leave which the Complainant submits was carried forward by agreement with the Respondent in 2021 and 2022. She retired from her employment with the Respondent in July 2022.

The complaint under the Act was referred to the Workplace Relations Commission on 21 February 2024. It follows, therefore, that the period comprehended by the complaint is 22 August 2023 to 21 February 2024. Having regard to section 41(6) of the Act of 2015 referred to earlier, the Court finds that the complaint is statute barred. The appeal, accordingly, fails and the decision of the Adjudication Officer is affirmed.

The Court so decides.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Alan Haugh
AR ______________________
24th April 2025 Deputy Chairman



NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Decision should be addressed to Aidan Ralph, Court Secretary.