This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

HSD259

null

HSC/23/28

DECISION  NO.  HSD259

SECTION 44, WORKPLACE RELATIONS ACT 2015
SECTION 29 (1), SAFETY HEALTH AND WELFARE AT WORK ACTS , 2005 TO 2014


PARTIES:

ROTUNDA HOSPITAL
(REPRESENTED BY IBEC)

AND

MS SIOBHAN MCNALLY



DIVISION:

Chairman: Ms O'Donnell
Employer Member: Ms Doyle
Worker Member: Ms Hannick



SUBJECT:

Appeal of Adjudication Officer Decision No(s) ADJ-00044662 CA-00055447-001


BACKGROUND:

The Complainant appealed the Decision of the Adjudication Officer to the Labour Court in accordance with Section 29(1) of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Acts, 2005 to 2014.  A Labour Court hearing took place on  05 February 2025.

The following is the Decision of the Court:-






DECISION:

Background to the Appeal

This is an appeal by Ms Siobhan McNally (the Complainant) from decision ADJ-00044662 CA-00055447-001 of an Adjudication Officer, under the Safety Health and Welfare at Work Acts,2005 to 2014 in respect of her complaint against her employer Rotunda Hospital (the Respondent). 

The Court heard the appeal in Dublin on 5 February 2025, along with six other appeals.

The Adjudication Officer dismissed the claim on the basis that it was frivolous.  The complaint was received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 8 March 2023 some forty six months after her employment with the Respondent had terminated on 20th May 2019 as previously found by the Labour Court in EDA2148 (13 December 2021 and 4 July 2022) and LCR22612 (10th June 2022).

 

Discussion

 In a case where the Adjudication Officer dismisses a complaint as frivolous the role of the Court is limited to determining whether to uphold that finding or set it aside and return the case to the WRC for hearing of the substantive issue.

The decision of the Court that determined the Complainants employment terminated on 20th May 2019 was not appealed. The fact that the Complainant continues to submit claims years after that event, having decided not to appeal that earlier decision, gives support to the finding of the Adjudication Officer that this complaint is frivolous and should be dismissed. The Complainant made a submission and was afforded the opportunity to read same to the Court.

The Representative for the Employer read their submission, submitting that the case was frivolous and should be dismissed. Having considered the submissions of both parties the Court finds that the claim lacks any legal merit under the Act and is therefore frivolous.

 

Determination

The Court finds that the claim is frivolous

The Decision of the Adjudication Officer is upheld

The Court so determines.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Louise O'Donnell
AL ______________________
11th March 2025 Deputy Chairman



NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Decision should be addressed to Amy Leonard, Court Secretary.