This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

LCR22786

FULL RECOMMENDATION


CD/23/79
RECOMMENDATION  NO.  LCR22786

SECTION 20(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969


PARTIES:
MCT RETAIL SOLUTIONS LIMITED

- AND -

A WORKER


DIVISION:

Chairman: Ms O'Donnell
Employer Member: Mr Marie
Worker Member: Ms Treacy


SUBJECT:

1. Dismissal

BACKGROUND:

2. The Claimant referred this case to the Labour Court on 12 June 2023 in accordance with Section 20 (1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969, and agreed to be bound by the Court’s Recommendation. A Labour Court hearing took place on 28 June 2023.





RECOMMENDATION:

The Employer did not attend the hearing.

The Worker commenced employment with this employer on the 1st December 2021 on a six month contract which contained a six month probationary period, that was to terminate on the 30th May 2022. She received a further 12-month contract on the 31st May 2022which contained a further six month probationary period. The Workers was dismissed on the 17th November 2022.

The Worker stated that on the 11th October 2022 she had showed up for work one hour late. This was the first and only time something like that had happened. On the 23rd October 2022 her Manager came into the store and gave her verbal warning in respect of that instance, and she accepted the warning. The Manager advised her that there would be a follow up review with the Manager in two weeks but that never happened.

On the 17th November she was called into work early to cover a shift. The Regional Manager who had travelled down from Dublin was present and was talking to her manager. She was then called into a backroom by the Regional Manager and told that she was being fired effective immediately. She was handed a letter that stated she was still on probation and had received a verbal warning and that the company had decided to end her employment as they did not consider her a good fit.

While the Workers contract contains a disciplinary procedure, neither that procedure nor any procedure was followed in coming to the decision to dismiss her.

Discussion and Recommendation.

It is clear to the Court from the Worker’s submission that she was not afforded any process or opportunity to engage with the Employer as required under the Code of Practise on Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures, S.I. No. 146/2000. The Court recommends that the Employer pay the Worker compensation of €1,850.

The Court so Recommends.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Louise O'Donnell
CO'R ______________________
11 July 2023 Deputy Chairman


NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to Clodagh O'Reilly, Court Secretary.