This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

LCR22703

FULL RECOMMENDATION


CD/22/195
ADJ-00039826, CA-00048570
RECOMMENDATION  NO. LCR22703

SECTION 20(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969


PARTIES :
PREMIER/LA CREME RECRUITMENT (MORGAN MCKINLEY)
(REPRESENTED BY IRISH BUSINESS AND EMPLOYERS' CONFEDERATION)

- AND -

A WORKER


DIVISION :

Chairman: Mr Geraghty
Employer Member: Ms Doyle
Worker Member: Ms Treacy

SUBJECT:

1. Appeal of Adjudication Officer Decision No(s) ADJ-00039826, CA-00048570.

BACKGROUND:

2. The Worker referred the case to the Labour Court on 27 September 2022 in accordance with Section 20 (1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969, and agreed to be bound by the Court’s Recommendation. A Labour Court hearing took place on 9 December 2022.

RECOMMENDATION :

Summary of Worker arguments.

1. The Worker was dismissed unfairly. She was told not to return after contracting Covid.

2. The Worker was replaced by somebody on a permanent contract but she was never informed.

3. The Worker completed every task assigned to her.


Summary of Employer arguments


1. The Worker was employed on a fixed term contract commencing on 12 November 2021 for six weeks. This was extended with a new end date of 14 January 2022. The purpose of the contract was for the Worker to work with the Respondent’s client, who subsequently placed the Worker with one of their clients.

2. The terms of the contract make clear that it would terminate on 14 January 2022.

3. The contract also makes clear that any renewal of contract would be dictated by the client’s resource requirements. The Respondent understands that the client subsequently filled the post on a permanent basis.


Recommendation

The contract on which the Worker was employed was for a fixed term. The fixed term came to an end. The contract was clear in not giving any guarantee of renewal. Therefore, the Court is obliged to conclude that there was no unfair dismissal and cannot make a recommendation in favour of the Worker.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Tom Geraghty
TH ______________________
4 January 2023 Deputy Chairman


NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to Therese Hickey, Court Secretary.