This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

UDD2118

FULL RECOMMENDATION


UD/18/150
ADJ-00011419 CA-00015302-001
DETERMINATION NO. UDD2118

SECTION 8A, UNFAIR DISMISSAL ACTS, 1977 TO 2015


PARTIES :
SHAW & SONS LIMITED
(REPRESENTED BY PENINSULA)

- AND -

JACKLYN RYAN
(REPRESENTED BY JONES CARTER & CO)


DIVISION :

Chairman: Mr Haugh
Employer Member: Mr Marie
Worker Member: Ms Treacy

SUBJECT:

1. Appeal of Adjudication Officer Decision no. ADJ-00011419, CA-00015302-001

BACKGROUND:

2. The Employer appealed the Decision of the Adjudication Officer to the Labour Court on 23 August 2018 in accordance with Section 8A of the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 to 2015. A Labour Court hearing took place on 12 March 2021. The following is the Determination of the Court:-

DETERMINATION :

Background to the Appeal

This is an appeal on behalf of Shaw & Sons (“the Respondent”) from a decision of an Adjudication Officer (ADJ-00011418, dated 1 August 2018) under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 (‘the Act’). The Adjudication Officer upheld Ms Ryan’s (“the Complainant”) complaint of constructive unfair dismissal and awarded her compensation of €3,000.00.

The Notice of Appeal was received by the Court on 23 August 2018. The Court heard the appeal in a virtual courtroom on 12 March 2021. The Respondent furnished a written submission to the Court in advance of the hearing. No submission was received from the Complainant. The Complainant did not attend at the within hearing. The Court has satisfied itself that the Complainant’s Solicitor was duly notified of the hearing arrangements for the appeal.

Discussion and Decision

The Complainant’s claim is one of constructive unfair dismissal. It follows, therefore, that the burden of proof rests on the Complainant. An appeal from a decision of an Adjudication Officer under the Act is a de novo appeal i.e. the Court is required to hear the matter afresh. As the Complainant elected not to attend at the hearing she has not discharged the burden of proof placed on her by the Act. The appeal, accordingly, succeeds and the decision of the Adjudication Officer is set aside.

The Court so determines

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Alan Haugh
H.M. ______________________
23/03/2021 Deputy Chairman


NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Determination should be addressed to Heather Murray, Court Secretary.