This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

LCR22263

FULL RECOMMENDATION

CD/20/194
RECOMMENDATION NO. LCR22263

SECTION 20(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969


PARTIES :
ABBVIE CORK

- AND -

SIPTU MEMBERS
(REPRESENTED BY SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL UNION)


DIVISION :

Chairman: Ms Jenkinson
Employer Member: Ms Doyle
Worker Member: Mr Hall

SUBJECT:

1. Pay Increase and Negotiate Installation Of Cameras

BACKGROUND:

2. On the 23 June 2020 the Union on behalf of its' members referred the issue to the Labour Court, in accordance with Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969. A Labour Court hearing took place in a virtual court room on 6 October 2020.

The Union agreed to be bound by the Court’s Recommendation.

RECOMMENDATION :

The matter before the Court concerns a dispute in relation to pay and the use of CCTV following the Company’s refusal to meet with the Union to discuss, negotiate and reach agreement on a collective pay increase for its members in the Company. The claim was referred to the Court under Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969.

For reasons which were furnished to the Court, the Company did not attend nor was it represented at the hearing.

The Court notes that in 2017 the Union submitted a claim to the Court under Section 20(1) of the 1969 Act, also seeking the right to represent their members in the General Operative grade collectively and individually in engagements and bargaining with the employer. At that time the Court, in Labour Court Recommendation LCR21501, recommended as follows:-

  • ...that the parties put in place arrangements to provide for collective representation of its membership by the Trade Union in relation to all matters associated with terms and conditions of employment including pay. Those arrangements should complement and function appropriately alongside current arrangements in place as regards a forum for engagement in the company.

Having considered the Union’s submission to the case here before it, the Court reiterates the Recommendation made above and recommends that the Company should meet with the Union to discuss and negotiate on the employment matters referred to the Court herein.

The Court so Recommends.

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Caroline Jenkinson
DC ______________________
12 October 2020 Deputy Chairman


NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to David Campbell, Court Secretary.