This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

MND207

FULL RECOMMENDATION


MN/20/12
ADJ-00023937 CA-00030557-002
DETERMINATION NO. MND207

MINIMUM NOTICE AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT ACTS, 1973 TO 2005


PARTIES :
GRIFFITH J ROBERTS LIMITED

- AND -

MR RYTIS SEDLECKAS
(REPRESENTED BY SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL UNION)


DIVISION :

Chairman: Ms O'Donnell
Employer Member: Ms Doyle
Worker Member: Ms Treacy

SUBJECT:

1. An appeal of an Adjudication Officer's Decision No.ADJ-00023937

BACKGROUND:

2. The Employee appealed the Decision of the Adjudication Officer to the Labour Court on 22 January 2020 in accordance with the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973 to 2005. A Labour Court hearing took place on 13 October 2020. The following is the Determination of the Court:-




DETERMINATION :

This is an appeal by Rytis Sedleckas (the Complainant) against an Adjudication Officer’s Decision ADJ-00023937 given under the Minimum Notice and Terms 0f Employment Acts 1973 to 2005 (“the Acts”) in a claim that he was unfairly dismissed by the “Respondent”, his former employer, and was not paid his minimum notice entitlements under the Act. The Adjudication Officer held that the complaint was not well founded.

Background

The Complainant commenced employment with the Respondent in October 2006 as a hydraulic fitter/general operative. From time to time when work was scarce the Respondent would get staff to do other jobs including painting, unpacking deliveries, cleaning and servicing Director’s cars rather than laying them off. In the past the Respondent had sent several employees on a welding course to broaden their skill set but the Complainant declined to do the course. On the 19th April 2019 the Complainant was asked to clean a Director’s car, he declined to do so and left the premises

This case is linked to case UD/20/29 where the Court determined no dismissal occurred. On the basis that no dismissal occurred no entitlement arises under this Act .

The Decision of the Adjudication Officer is upheld

The Court so Determines

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Louise O'Donnell
CC ______________________
4 November 2020 Deputy Chairman


NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Determination should be addressed to Ceola Cronin, Court Secretary.