This website contains decisions and determinations of both the Labour Court and the WRC. It also contains decisions and recommendations of the Equality Tribunal since 1996 and post 2007 determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. For more information click here

PWD1922

FULL RECOMMENDATION
PW/19/37
DETERMINATION NO. PWD1922
ADJ-00018845 CA-00024398-001 CA-00024434-001 CA-00025229-001/2/3/4/5/6

SECTION 7(1), PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1991


PARTIES :
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND INNOVATION
(REPRESENTED BY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND INNOVATION)

- AND -

MR CONAR KENNEDY


DIVISION :

Chairman: Mr Geraghty
Employer Member: Ms Doyle
Worker Member: Mr McCarthy
SUBJECT:
1. An appeal of Adjudication Officer's Decision No. ADJ-00018845.


BACKGROUND:

2. The Employee appealed the Adjudication Officer's Decision to the Labour Court in accordance with Section 7(1) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 on 28 May 2019. The Court heard the appeal on the 30 July 2019 in accordance with Section 44 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015. The following is the Court's Determination:-



DETERMINATION :

Background

Mr. Kennedy, ‘the Complainant’ made a number of separate complaints under the Payment of Wages Act 1991, to the Workplace Relations Commission, that his employer, the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation, had breached his rights. The Adjudication Officer decided that the complaints were not well founded.
The Complainant appealed the decision.
The Complainant did not attend the hearing to move his appeal.

Deliberation

The jurisprudence of this and other Courts is that an appellant cannot move an appeal in their absence.

Determination

The decision of the Adjudication Officer is upheld.



Signed on behalf of the Labour Court



Tom Geraghty
CC ______________________
12th August 2019 Deputy Chairman



NOTE

Enquiries concerning this Determination should be addressed to Ceola Cronin, Court Secretary.