EMPLOYMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL
APPEALS OF: | CASE NO. |
– Appellant (Employer) | |
against eight (8) recommendations of a Rights Commissioner R-111764-TE-11/RG, R-111765-TE-11/RG, R-111767-TE-11/RG, R-111768-TE-11/RG, R-111771-TE-11/RG, R-111773-TE-11/RG, R-111774-TE-11/RG, R-111776-TE-11/RG, in the cases of: | |
– Respondent (First Named Employee) | TE45/2012 |
– Respondent (Second Named Employee) | TE46/2012 |
– Respondent (Third Named Employee) | TE47/2012 |
– Respondent (Fourth Named Employee) | TE48/2012 |
– Respondent (Fifth Named Employee) | TE49/2012 |
– Respondent (Sixth Named Employee) | TE50/2012 |
– Respondent (Seventh Named Employee) | TE51/2012 |
– Respondent (Eighth Named Employee) | TE52/2012 |
under |
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT (INFORMATION) ACTS, 1994 TO 2001
I certify that the Tribunal
(Division of Tribunal)
Chairman: Ms M. Levey BL
Members: Mr C. McHugh
Mr S. O’Donnell
heard these appeals at Dublin on 1 October 2013
Representation:
Appellant (The Employer):
No appearance by or representation on behalf of the appellant
Respondents (The Employees):
Ms Bernadette Thornton, SIPTU, Liberty Hall, Dublin 1
These cases came before the Tribunal by way of appeals by the employer against eight recommendations of a Rights Commissioner
The determination of the Tribunal was as follows: -
Determination
Being satisfied that the appellant/employer was properly on notice of the hearing the Tribunal finds that all eight appeals under the Terms of Employment (Information) Acts, 1994 to 2001 fail for want of prosecution.
Sealed with the Seal of the
Employment Appeals Tribunal
This ________________________
(Sgd.) ________________________
(CHAIRMAN)