Up Arrow
 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and press GO

 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and then press GO

 
 
 

2001

Information Icon Water Mark
Up Arrow

Add to Binder allows you to add Workplace Relations content to your personal binder for viewing or printing later.

Binder icon image Binder

To access your binder, click the Binder link at the top of the page.

 
 

DEC-E2001-028

Employment Equality Act, 1977

Equality Officer Recommendation

DEC-E2001-028

70 Named Female Employees
(represented by MANDATE)

-v-

Superquinn
(represented by IBEC)

File No. EE07/1998
Date of issue: 21 September 2001

Employment - Sex -Discriminatory Treatment - Cleaning of Staff Uniforms - Direct Discrimination - Indirect Discrimination - Prima Facie Case - The Employment Equality Act, 1977: sections 2(a) 2(c) and 3 Equal Treatment Directive

This dispute concerns a claim by MANDATE, on behalf of 70 named female employees of Superquinn, Sutton that they are discriminated against by the respondent in relation to the cleaning of staff uniforms on grounds of sex. The claim was referred in February 1998 under Sections 2(a) and 2(c) of the Employment Equality Act, 1977. In Superquinn Sutton departments are divided into two categories fresh food and non-fresh food, likewise staff uniforms are divided into two main categories, in fresh food departments staff wear white uniforms and non-white uniforms are generally worn at checkouts, shop floor and similar areas. The fresh food/white uniforms are cleaned by the company while employees in other areas are responsible for cleaning their own uniforms.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Share this page

 
logo-sml
Links|About the Reform Programme|Accessibility|Privacy Policy|Disclaimer|Sitemap

Registered Address: Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation, O'Brien Road, Carlow